The law is complicated and the bill so poorly constructed that those in charge of writing the WAC's (administrative code) haven't been able to satisfactorily complete the codes. This has kept the school districts from being able to provide a clear picture of what the costs to the employees will be. There is one cost that has become clear...those individuals who only insure themselves will now have to pay a portion of their premiums. The law says that families will not pay more than 3x than the individual.
Oh how the wailing and knashing of teeth that has gone on because of that one item. Those who insure only themselves and choose a plan that doesn't go over the amount allotted from the state don't feel like they should have to pay more just to support those who have a family. Some of the arguments I have heard are:
- It's not fair
- I choose not to have children so why should I pay more?
- I've already spent 20 years paying the increased premiums when I had children at home, now it's my turn to
suck off the systemhave some reduced costs.
This is probably not a very popular interpretation on the situation and maybe I'm wrong in my interpretation, but that is how I see it. I just wish I had been brave enough to share my thoughts about this today at the executive board meeting for our local teachers union--I'm a member of the executive board but definitely find myself in the minority of several political issues and it's hard to be brave when you are the only voice for that particular viewpoint.
1 comment:
Union folks never thought they would be on the "rich" side of these things.........
Post a Comment